Süper Lig · 2026/27
The teams’ season landscape.
How do teams compare in attack, passing and defence? Choose a chart to see where your club stands.
81 completed matches through 2026-10-26 · xG: 81 matches
SÜPER LİG / CLUB COMPARISON
How do clubs compare across 12 metrics?
2026/27 · 81 matches in the shared data cohort · 2026-10-26 · Standings: 2026-10-26
Galatasaray#1 · 9 matches
Amed SFK#2 · 9 matches| Metric | Galatasaray | Amed SFK |
|---|---|---|
| Goals scored / game | 2.114. rank · 9 games | 2.223. rank · 9 games |
| xG / game | 2.311. rank · 9 games | 1.905. rank · 9 games |
| Lower xGA defence lower values outward | 1.033. rank · 9 games | 0.861. rank · 9 games |
| Fewer goals conceded defence lower values outward | 1.339. rank · 9 games | 1.116. rank · 9 games |
| Shots on target / game | 7.671. rank · 9 games | 5.007. rank · 9 games |
| Passes / game | 4744. rank · 9 games | 40112. rank · 9 games |
| Pass completion % | 86.4%2. rank · 9 games | 82.2%12. rank · 9 games |
| Possession % | 60.3%2. rank · 9 games | 47.6%13. rank · 9 games |
| Corners / game | 7.781. rank · 9 games | 4.897. rank · 9 games |
| Total shots / game | 22.441. rank · 9 games | 15.785. rank · 9 games |
| Fewer shots faced defence lower values outward | 10.223. rank · 9 games | 10.112. rank · 9 games |
| Fewer corners faced defence lower values outward | 3.221. rank · 9 games | 4.116. rank · 9 games |
Farther out means a better position on every axis. Lower goals conceded, xGA, shots faced and corners faced plot outward; higher values plot outward on the other axes. Polygon area is not an overall strength score.
Radar scale and match coverage
We did not overlay incompatible raw units. For each metric we divided the count of lower-placed clubs plus half of ties by the count of valid clubs, reversing direction for defensive axes. Ties share ranks. Every axis uses the same match cohort with xG coverage. Possession is the mean of match percentages; pass completion is total completed passes divided by total passes. Missing values are not zero.
Create your own map
65 statistics · two axes · your comparison
Choose a statistic for each axis, then select totals or per-match values. The chart updates with your choices.
2026/27 · 18 clubs · 81 completed matches. Selecting xG restricts both axes to the same matches with verified xG.
18 teams shown · Horizontal: Expected goals (xG) / match · Vertical: Goals scored / match
Expected goals (xG) × Goals scored
FotMob xG modeli.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
Average of teams shown
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Chart values
| Club | Matches | Expected goals (xG) per match | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
 Galatasaray | 9 | 2.31 | 2.11 |
 Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.11 | 2.56 |
 Göztepe | 9 | 2.01 | 2.11 |
 Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.97 | 2.44 |
 Amed SFK | 9 | 1.90 | 2.22 |
 Beşiktaş | 9 | 1.84 | 2.00 |
 İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.46 | 1.33 |
 Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.43 | 1.22 |
 Çorum FK | 9 | 1.31 | 2.00 |
 Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.24 | 1.22 |
 Samsunspor | 9 | 1.19 | 0.89 |
 Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.18 | 1.00 |
 Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.15 | 1.44 |
 Konyaspor | 9 | 1.14 | 0.67 |
 Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.13 | 1.00 |
 Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.03 | 0.78 |
 Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
 Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.79 | 0.22 |
Percentages and rates such as xG per shot keep their own units. Home and away figures use only matches at the relevant venue. Teams without a recorded metric are omitted rather than assigned zero. See the methodology for calculations and coverage.
Attacking efficiency
Chance creation, shots and goals.
Are chances turning into goals?xG per match × Scored / match
Are chances turning into goals?
Teams above the line scored more than their xG; those below scored fewer. The gap cannot be attributed to luck or finishing alone. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Çorum FK scored 2 goals per game from 1.31 xG, the largest positive gap. That gap alone cannot establish lasting finishing ability.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG per match | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.31 | 2.11 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.11 | 2.56 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.01 | 2.11 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.97 | 2.44 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 1.90 | 2.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 1.84 | 2.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.46 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.43 | 1.22 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.31 | 2.00 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.24 | 1.22 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.19 | 0.89 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.18 | 1.00 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.15 | 1.44 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.14 | 0.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.13 | 1.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.03 | 0.78 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.79 | 0.22 |
Does possession produce goals?Possession (%) × Scored / match
Does possession produce goals?
Do teams with more possession score more? Possession is averaged across matches.
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş had the most possession at 62.3%, scoring 2 goals per game. Goal leader Fenerbahçe scored 2.56 from 53.5% possession, so control of the ball and scoring output need separate measures.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Possession (%) | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 62.3 | 2.00 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 60.3 | 2.11 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 55.2 | 0.89 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 53.8 | 2.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 53.6 | 1.22 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 53.5 | 2.56 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 52.6 | 2.44 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 51.1 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 50.1 | 1.33 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 50.1 | 0.22 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 48.9 | 0.67 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 48.7 | 1.22 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 47.6 | 2.22 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 43.6 | 1.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 43.5 | 0.78 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 42.7 | 1.44 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 42.2 | 0.89 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 40.1 | 2.11 |
Corner production and goalsCorners per match × Scored / match
Corner production and goals
Goal totals include all goals, not just those scored from corners.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray averaged 7.78 corners and 2.11 goals. Goal leader Fenerbahçe averaged 6.11 corners and 2.56 goals; these are all goals, not only goals from corners.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Corners per match | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 7.78 | 2.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 7.44 | 2.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 6.11 | 2.56 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 5.33 | 1.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 5.22 | 2.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 5.00 | 0.78 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 4.89 | 2.22 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 4.89 | 1.22 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 4.56 | 2.11 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 4.56 | 1.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 4.44 | 0.89 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 4.33 | 1.44 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 4.11 | 2.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 4.11 | 1.33 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 4.00 | 1.22 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 3.89 | 0.22 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 3.22 | 0.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 3.00 | 0.89 |
Shots and goalsShots per match × Scored / match
Shots and goals
Does taking more shots lead to more goals? Check the xG charts to compare chance quality too.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray took the most shots at 22.44 per game and scored 2.11 goals. Fenerbahçe scored 2.56 from 16.78 shots, separating volume from scoring output.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Shots per match | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 22.44 | 2.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 17.67 | 2.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 16.78 | 2.56 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.11 | 2.11 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 15.78 | 2.22 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 15.11 | 1.22 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 13.89 | 2.44 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 1.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.67 | 0.89 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.78 | 1.22 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 12.67 | 2.00 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 12.44 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 12.11 | 0.78 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 12.00 | 1.33 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.89 | 0.22 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 11.44 | 1.00 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 11.00 | 0.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 9.56 | 0.89 |
Shot volume and chance qualityShots per match × xG per match
Shot volume and chance quality
Does xG rise in line with shot volume? Both figures use the same matches. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray leads both plotted measures, at 22.44 on the horizontal axis and 2.31 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Shots per match | xG per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 22.44 | 2.31 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 17.67 | 1.84 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 16.78 | 2.11 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.11 | 2.01 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 15.78 | 1.90 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 15.11 | 1.43 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 13.89 | 1.97 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 1.18 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.67 | 1.19 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.78 | 1.24 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 12.67 | 1.31 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 12.44 | 1.15 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 12.11 | 1.03 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 12.00 | 1.46 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.89 | 0.79 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 11.44 | 1.13 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 11.00 | 1.14 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 9.56 | 0.88 |
Are shots finding the target?Shots per match × Shots on target per match
Are shots finding the target?
How many shots are on target? Both axes show shots per match.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray led shots on target with 7.67 from 22.44 shots per game. That is 34.2% of its attempts.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Shots per match | Shots on target per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 22.44 | 7.67 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 17.67 | 6.33 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 16.78 | 6.78 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.11 | 5.78 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 15.78 | 5.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 15.11 | 5.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 13.89 | 6.78 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 3.67 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.67 | 3.22 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.78 | 4.33 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 12.67 | 5.11 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 12.44 | 4.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 12.11 | 3.67 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 12.00 | 4.00 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.89 | 3.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 11.44 | 3.56 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 11.00 | 3.56 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 9.56 | 2.89 |
Shot volume and conversion rateShots per match × Shot conversion (%)
Shot volume and conversion rate
Goals divided by shots. The goal total includes own goals, so this is not a measure of individual finishing.
What the chart tells us Trabzonspor had the highest goals-to-shots ratio at 17.6%. Shot-volume leader Galatasaray recorded 9.4%, showing why the two measures should be read together.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Shots per match | Shot conversion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 22.44 | 9.4 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 17.67 | 11.3 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 16.78 | 15.2 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.11 | 13.1 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 15.78 | 14.1 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 15.11 | 8.1 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 13.89 | 17.6 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 7.3 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.67 | 6.5 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.78 | 9.6 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 12.67 | 15.8 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 12.44 | 11.6 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 12.11 | 6.4 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 12.00 | 11.1 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.89 | 1.9 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 11.44 | 8.7 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 11.00 | 6.1 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 9.56 | 9.3 |
Passes and goalsPasses per match × Scored / match
Passes and goals
Do teams that pass more score more? Both axes use the same verified match set.
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş led passing volume at 515.44 passes per game, scoring 2 goals. Goal leader Fenerbahçe scored 2.56 from 467.33 passes; more passes alone do not explain the scoreline.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Passes per match | Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 515.44 | 2.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 495.67 | 0.89 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 483.11 | 2.00 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 473.67 | 2.11 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 467.33 | 2.56 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 442.78 | 2.44 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 442.00 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 441.78 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 441.56 | 1.22 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 416.56 | 1.22 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 409.89 | 0.22 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 401.22 | 2.22 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 394.33 | 0.89 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 393.44 | 0.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 362.22 | 1.00 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 353.89 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 335.22 | 0.78 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 287.22 | 2.11 |
Passing accuracy and chance creationPassing accuracy (%) × xG per match
Passing accuracy and chance creation
Pass completion is calculated from completed passes divided by all attempted passes across the matches. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş led pass completion at 87.3%, producing 1.84 xG per game. xG leader Galatasaray recorded 86.4% and 2.31 xG, separating accurate circulation from chance creation.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Passing accuracy (%) | xG per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 87.3 | 1.84 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 86.4 | 2.31 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 86.2 | 2.11 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 85.4 | 1.31 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 85.0 | 1.97 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 84.7 | 0.79 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 84.4 | 1.43 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 84.3 | 1.19 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 83.9 | 1.46 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 83.3 | 1.18 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 82.5 | 0.88 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 82.2 | 1.90 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 81.8 | 1.14 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 81.0 | 1.13 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 80.0 | 1.24 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 78.9 | 1.15 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 78.9 | 1.03 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 70.1 | 2.01 |
Shot quality and conversionxG per shot × Goals per shot (%)
Shot quality and conversion
Have teams taking better-quality shots converted a higher share into goals? These are team totals. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Trabzonspor leads both plotted measures, at 0.142 on the horizontal axis and 17.6 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG per shot | Goals per shot (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 0.142 | 17.6 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 0.126 | 15.2 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 0.125 | 13.1 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 0.122 | 11.1 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 0.121 | 14.1 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.104 | 11.3 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 0.104 | 6.1 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 0.103 | 15.8 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 0.103 | 9.4 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 0.099 | 8.7 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 0.097 | 9.6 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 0.095 | 8.1 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.092 | 9.3 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 0.092 | 11.6 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 0.087 | 6.5 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 0.087 | 7.3 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 0.085 | 6.4 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.067 | 1.9 |
Defensive efficiency
Chances allowed, opponent shots and protecting the goal.
Which teams concede fewer goals?xG conceded per match × Conceded / match
Which teams concede fewer goals?
Teams below the line conceded fewer goals than their opponents’ chances would suggest. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Trabzonspor conceded 0.89 goals per game against 1.57 xGA, the largest shortfall against expected goals conceded. Results and chances allowed tell different parts of the defensive story.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG conceded per match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 2.17 | 2.00 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 1.99 | 2.56 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.69 | 2.33 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 1.68 | 1.78 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.67 | 1.56 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.66 | 1.22 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.63 | 1.67 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.57 | 0.89 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.46 | 1.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 1.38 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.37 | 1.67 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.36 | 1.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.27 | 0.89 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.21 | 1.00 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.14 | 1.00 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.03 | 1.33 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.94 | 1.11 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 0.86 | 1.11 |
Shots faced and goals concededOpposition shots per match × Conceded / match
Shots faced and goals conceded
Do teams that allow fewer shots concede fewer goals?
What the chart tells us Gençlerbirliği allowed the most shots at 18 per game and conceded 2 goals. Eyüpspor conceded the most goals at 2.56 from 13.67 shots, so volume alone does not describe the danger.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Opposition shots per match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 18.00 | 2.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 16.67 | 2.33 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 15.78 | 1.78 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 15.67 | 1.22 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 15.44 | 1.67 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 15.22 | 1.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 14.44 | 0.89 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 14.44 | 1.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 14.11 | 0.89 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 14.11 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 14.00 | 1.67 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 1.67 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 13.67 | 2.56 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 13.22 | 1.56 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.89 | 1.00 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 10.22 | 1.33 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 10.11 | 1.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 9.33 | 1.11 |
Shots faced and chance quality allowedOpposition shots per match × xG conceded per match
Shots faced and chance quality allowed
A team may allow few shots but still give up dangerous chances. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Gençlerbirliği leads both plotted measures, at 18 on the horizontal axis and 2.17 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Opposition shots per match | xG conceded per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 18.00 | 2.17 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 16.67 | 1.69 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 15.78 | 1.68 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 15.67 | 1.66 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 15.44 | 1.46 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 15.22 | 1.36 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 14.44 | 1.27 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 14.44 | 1.14 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 14.11 | 1.57 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 14.11 | 1.38 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 14.00 | 1.37 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 13.67 | 1.63 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 13.67 | 1.99 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 13.22 | 1.67 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.89 | 1.21 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 10.22 | 1.03 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 10.11 | 0.86 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 9.33 | 0.94 |
Opponents’ shots on target and goalsOpposition shots on target per match × Conceded / match
Opponents’ shots on target and goals
Shots on target faced and goals conceded. These figures alone cannot separate the goalkeeper’s contribution from the defence’s.
What the chart tells us Fenerbahçe conceded only 0.89 goals per game from 4.56 shots on target faced. Eyüpspor conceded 2.56 from 5.44; the same kind of shot count can lead to different outcomes.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Opposition shots on target per match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 7.11 | 2.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 6.33 | 2.33 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 5.44 | 2.56 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 5.33 | 0.89 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 5.22 | 1.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 5.11 | 1.22 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 4.78 | 1.78 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 4.78 | 1.67 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 4.56 | 0.89 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 4.56 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 4.44 | 1.56 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 4.33 | 1.33 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 4.11 | 1.00 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 4.00 | 1.67 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 3.89 | 1.11 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 3.89 | 1.00 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 3.67 | 1.11 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 3.44 | 1.33 |
Chances allowed and clean sheetsxG conceded per match × Clean-sheet rate (%)
Chances allowed and clean sheets
Teams in the top left allowed less xG and kept clean sheets in a larger share of matches. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Fenerbahçe kept a clean sheet in 55.6% of matches while allowing 1.27 xGA per game. Eyüpspor had the lowest clean-sheet share at 0%.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG conceded per match | Clean-sheet rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 2.17 | 11.1 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 1.99 | 0.0 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.69 | 11.1 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 1.68 | 22.2 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.67 | 33.3 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.66 | 33.3 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.63 | 22.2 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.57 | 44.4 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.46 | 22.2 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 1.38 | 44.4 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.37 | 22.2 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.36 | 33.3 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.27 | 55.6 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.21 | 44.4 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.14 | 33.3 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.03 | 33.3 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.94 | 33.3 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 0.86 | 33.3 |
Saves and goals concededSaves per match × Conceded / match
Saves and goals conceded
More saves can simply mean the goalkeeper has faced more shots.
What the chart tells us Gençlerbirliği averaged the most saves at 5.11 per game and conceded 2 goals. Lowest-conceding Fenerbahçe averaged 3.56 saves and 0.89 goals conceded; saves alone are not a goalkeeper ranking.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Saves per match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 5.11 | 2.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 4.33 | 0.89 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 4.00 | 1.22 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 4.00 | 2.33 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 3.56 | 0.89 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 3.56 | 1.00 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 3.56 | 1.67 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 3.33 | 1.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 3.22 | 1.67 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 3.11 | 1.00 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 3.11 | 1.33 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 3.11 | 1.56 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 3.00 | 1.78 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 2.89 | 2.56 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 2.78 | 1.11 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 2.44 | 1.11 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 2.33 | 1.67 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.11 | 1.33 |
Opponents’ corners and goals concededOpposition corners per match × Conceded / match
Opponents’ corners and goals conceded
All goals conceded are included, not only those from corners.
What the chart tells us Gençlerbirliği allowed 7 corners per game and conceded 2 goals. Eyüpspor conceded the most goals at 2.56 while allowing 5 corners; these goals include every scoring method.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Opposition corners per match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 7.00 | 1.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 7.00 | 2.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 6.11 | 2.33 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 5.67 | 1.67 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 5.56 | 1.00 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 5.56 | 1.00 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 5.00 | 2.56 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 4.56 | 1.33 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 4.56 | 1.78 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 4.56 | 1.67 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 4.44 | 0.89 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 4.22 | 1.56 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 4.11 | 1.11 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 4.00 | 0.89 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 4.00 | 1.22 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 3.78 | 1.67 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 3.56 | 1.11 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 3.22 | 1.33 |
Fouls and cards
Fouls and cards received by both sides in the same matches.
Fouls and total cardsFouls committed per match × Total cards received per match
Fouls and total cards
Cards are the sum of yellows and reds. One player can receive more than one card.
What the chart tells us Göztepe committed the most fouls at 16.22 per game and received 2.56 cards. Card leader Amed SFK received 3.11 from 14.67 fouls, so the rankings do not follow directly from each other.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Fouls committed per match | Total cards received per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.22 | 2.56 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 15.33 | 2.67 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 14.78 | 2.44 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 14.67 | 3.11 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 14.33 | 1.33 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 13.56 | 2.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 13.22 | 2.33 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 13.22 | 1.78 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 13.22 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 13.11 | 1.89 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.33 | 1.78 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.33 | 2.33 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 12.22 | 2.44 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 11.78 | 1.89 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 11.78 | 1.22 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 11.00 | 2.22 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.00 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 10.78 | 1.89 |
Fouls and yellow cardsFouls committed per match × Yellow cards received per match
Fouls and yellow cards
Foul and card counts do not establish whether refereeing decisions were correct.
What the chart tells us Amed SFK received 2.89 yellow cards per game from 14.67 fouls. Most-fouling Göztepe received 2.44 yellows; foul volume does not determine the card total.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Fouls committed per match | Yellow cards received per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.22 | 2.44 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 15.33 | 2.67 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 14.78 | 2.33 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 14.67 | 2.89 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 14.33 | 1.22 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 13.56 | 2.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 13.22 | 2.33 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 13.22 | 1.78 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 13.22 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 13.11 | 1.89 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.33 | 1.78 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.33 | 2.22 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 12.22 | 2.33 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 11.78 | 1.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 11.78 | 1.22 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 11.00 | 2.11 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.00 | 1.11 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 10.78 | 1.78 |
Fouls and red cardsFouls committed per match × Red cards received per match
Fouls and red cards
Red cards and fouls cover the same matches. Cards follow the source’s definition of dismissals.
What the chart tells us Amed SFK had the highest red-card rate at 0.22 per game alongside 14.67 fouls. Few dismissals underlie these rates; they cannot establish the severity of fouls or the correctness of decisions.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Fouls committed per match | Red cards received per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.22 | 0.11 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 15.33 | 0.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 14.78 | 0.11 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 14.67 | 0.22 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 14.33 | 0.11 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 13.56 | 0.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 13.22 | 0.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 13.22 | 0.00 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 13.22 | 0.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 13.11 | 0.00 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.33 | 0.00 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.33 | 0.11 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 12.22 | 0.11 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 11.78 | 0.22 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 11.78 | 0.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 11.00 | 0.11 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.00 | 0.22 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 10.78 | 0.11 |
Yellow cards and red cardsYellow cards received per match × Red cards received per match
Yellow cards and red cards
Do teams with more yellow cards also have more red cards?
What the chart tells us Amed SFK leads both plotted measures, at 2.89 on the horizontal axis and 0.22 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Yellow cards received per match | Red cards received per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amed SFK | 9 | 2.89 | 0.22 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 2.67 | 0.00 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.44 | 0.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 2.33 | 0.11 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 2.33 | 0.11 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 2.22 | 0.11 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 2.11 | 0.11 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 2.11 | 0.11 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.89 | 0.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.78 | 0.00 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.78 | 0.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.78 | 0.11 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.67 | 0.22 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.22 | 0.11 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 1.11 | 0.22 |
Fouls committed and sufferedFouls committed per match × Fouls suffered per match
Fouls committed and suffered
Teams above the line were fouled more often than they committed fouls.
What the chart tells us Eyüpspor committed 11 fouls per game and suffered 17.11, the largest positive difference at 6.11. Göztepe had the greatest difference in the opposite direction.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Fouls committed per match | Fouls suffered per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Göztepe | 9 | 16.22 | 9.11 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 15.33 | 13.33 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 14.78 | 11.67 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 14.67 | 11.22 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 14.33 | 13.44 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 13.56 | 11.11 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 13.22 | 14.89 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 13.22 | 10.33 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 13.22 | 13.67 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 13.11 | 11.78 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 12.33 | 15.22 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 12.33 | 13.33 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 12.22 | 15.67 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 11.78 | 12.56 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 11.78 | 10.89 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 11.00 | 16.78 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 11.00 | 17.11 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 10.78 | 12.78 |
Team and opponent yellow cardsYellow cards received per match × Opposition yellow cards per match
Team and opponent yellow cards
Teams above the line saw their opponents receive more yellow cards.
What the chart tells us Alanyaspor received 1.44 yellows per game while opponents received 2.44, the largest opponent-over-club gap. This does not establish why the cards were given or whether decisions were correct.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Yellow cards received per match | Opposition yellow cards per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amed SFK | 9 | 2.89 | 2.78 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 2.67 | 1.89 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.44 | 1.67 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 2.33 | 2.22 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 2.33 | 1.78 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 2.33 | 2.11 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 2.22 | 2.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 2.11 | 2.67 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 2.11 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.89 | 2.11 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.78 | 1.44 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.78 | 1.78 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.78 | 1.44 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.67 | 2.11 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.44 | 2.44 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 1.22 | 2.11 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.22 | 1.89 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 1.11 | 1.44 |
Team and opponent red cardsRed cards received per match × Opposition red cards per match
Team and opponent red cards
Red cards are rare here, so a single dismissal can noticeably change a team’s position.
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş averaged 0 reds against opponents’ 0.22, the largest positive opponent-over-club gap. One additional dismissal can change the ranking considerably in this small sample.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Red cards received per match | Opposition red cards per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 0.22 | 0.11 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 0.11 | 0.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.00 | 0.22 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Team and opponent total cardsTotal cards received per match × Opposition total cards per match
Team and opponent total cards
Above the line, opponents received more cards; below it, the team itself received more.
What the chart tells us Alanyaspor received 1.44 cards per game against opponents’ 2.44, the largest gap at 1. The measure adds yellows and reds, not distinct booked players.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Total cards received per match | Opposition total cards per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amed SFK | 9 | 3.11 | 2.89 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 2.67 | 2.00 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.56 | 1.78 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 2.44 | 1.78 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 2.44 | 2.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 2.33 | 2.44 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 2.22 | 2.78 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 2.22 | 1.44 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.89 | 2.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.89 | 1.44 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.89 | 2.11 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.78 | 1.44 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.78 | 1.89 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.44 | 2.44 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.33 | 2.11 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 1.33 | 1.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 1.22 | 2.11 |
Playing strength
Score control, attack-defence balance, passing and points.
Who controls the score?Time leading (%) × Time trailing (%)
Who controls the score?
Teams in the top right spent more time ahead and less time behind. The figures use goal timings over a 90-minute match.
What the chart tells us Trabzonspor led for 51.9% of match time, the highest share. Eyüpspor trailed for 71%, showing how differently the two sides experienced the scoreline.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Time leading (%) | Time trailing (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 51.9 | 15.7 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 50.6 | 13.8 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 50.1 | 21.2 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 38.8 | 21.6 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 35.4 | 20.6 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 34.4 | 16.3 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 32.6 | 19.0 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 32.1 | 35.2 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 29.5 | 32.3 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 29.4 | 22.7 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 27.4 | 27.5 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 24.9 | 30.9 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 20.7 | 19.0 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 16.9 | 18.5 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 15.9 | 37.3 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 14.2 | 38.4 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.7 | 57.5 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.0 | 71.0 |
Attack and defence balanceScored / match × Conceded / match
Attack and defence balance
Teams that score more and concede fewer are in the top right. The reference lines mark the league averages.
What the chart tells us Fenerbahçe combines the highest scoring rate (2.56 per game) with the lowest conceding rate (0.89). It leads both sides of this goals-based comparison.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Scored / match | Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.56 | 0.89 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 2.44 | 0.89 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 2.22 | 1.11 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.11 | 1.33 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.11 | 1.78 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 2.00 | 1.11 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 2.00 | 1.67 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.44 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.33 | 1.56 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.22 | 1.00 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.22 | 1.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.00 | 1.22 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.89 | 1.33 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 0.89 | 2.33 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 0.78 | 2.00 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.22 | 2.56 |
Chance advantage and pointsxG difference per match × Points / game
Chance advantage and points
Have teams with the better chances collected more points? xG difference is a team’s xG minus their opponents’ xG. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray leads both plotted measures, at 1.28 on the horizontal axis and 2.44 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG difference per match | Points / game |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 1.28 | 2.44 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 1.04 | 2.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.90 | 2.00 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 0.84 | 1.78 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 0.40 | 2.11 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 0.33 | 1.33 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 0.06 | 1.11 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 0.01 | 1.78 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | -0.07 | 0.89 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | -0.12 | 1.67 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | -0.16 | 1.44 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | -0.21 | 1.22 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | -0.44 | 0.89 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | -0.50 | 1.56 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | -0.50 | 0.44 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | -0.53 | 1.33 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | -1.14 | 0.89 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | -1.20 | 0.33 |
Does home strength travel?Home points per match × Away points per match
Does home strength travel?
Teams above the line average more points away; those below average more at home.
What the chart tells us Çaykur Rizespor averaged 0 points at home and 2 away, the largest away-over-home gap. Home advantage was not uniform across clubs in this snapshot.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Home points per match | Away points per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amed SFK | 9 | 3.00 | 1.25 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 3.00 | 1.40 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 3.00 | 0.75 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.60 | 2.25 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.25 | 1.40 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 2.25 | 1.20 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 2.25 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 2.00 | 0.25 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.50 | 1.40 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.40 | 0.25 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.25 | 1.40 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 0.40 | 1.50 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 0.20 | 0.75 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
Expected goals created and allowedxG per match × xG conceded per match
Expected goals created and allowed
Teams in the top right created more xG and allowed less. Both figures come from the same xG model. Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray produced 2.31 xG per game and allowed 1.03 xGA. Lowest-xGA Amed SFK produced 1.9 and allowed 0.86, separating attacking production from chance prevention.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | xG per match | xG conceded per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.31 | 1.03 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.11 | 1.27 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 2.01 | 1.68 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.97 | 1.57 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 1.90 | 0.86 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 1.84 | 0.94 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 1.46 | 1.67 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.43 | 1.37 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.31 | 1.46 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 1.24 | 1.36 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 1.19 | 1.69 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 1.18 | 1.63 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.15 | 1.14 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.14 | 1.21 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.13 | 1.66 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.03 | 2.17 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 0.88 | 1.38 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.79 | 1.99 |
Time leading and pointsTime leading (%) × Points / game
Time leading and points
Have teams that spent more time in the lead converted that advantage into points?
What the chart tells us Trabzonspor led for 51.9% of playing time and earned 2.11 points per game. Points leader Galatasaray earned 2.44 while leading for 34.4%, so time ahead is not equivalent to points won.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Time leading (%) | Points / game |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 51.9 | 2.11 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 50.6 | 1.78 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 50.1 | 1.33 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 38.8 | 2.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 35.4 | 1.22 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 34.4 | 2.44 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 32.6 | 1.78 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 32.1 | 1.44 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 29.5 | 1.67 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 29.4 | 1.56 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 27.4 | 2.22 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 24.9 | 1.11 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 20.7 | 0.89 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 16.9 | 1.33 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 15.9 | 0.89 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 14.2 | 0.89 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 13.7 | 0.44 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.0 | 0.33 |
Goal difference and pointsGoal difference / match × Points / game
Goal difference and points
Has a better goal difference brought more points per game?
What the chart tells us Fenerbahçe recorded a +1.67 goal difference per game and 1.78 points. Points leader Galatasaray earned 2.44 with +0.78 goal difference; a larger winning margin earns no extra league points.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Goal difference / match | Points / game |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 1.67 | 1.78 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 1.56 | 2.11 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 1.11 | 2.22 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 0.89 | 2.00 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 0.78 | 2.44 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 0.44 | 1.78 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 0.33 | 1.44 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 0.33 | 1.33 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 0.22 | 1.67 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | -0.22 | 1.33 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | -0.22 | 1.22 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | -0.33 | 0.89 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | -0.44 | 1.56 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | -0.44 | 1.11 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | -0.67 | 0.89 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | -1.22 | 0.89 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | -1.44 | 0.44 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | -2.33 | 0.33 |
Passes and time in the leadPasses per match × Time leading (%)
Passes and time in the lead
Did teams that made more passes spend more time in the lead?
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş averaged 515.44 passes per game and led for 38.8% of playing time. Time-ahead leader Trabzonspor recorded 442.78 passes and 51.9% time ahead, distinguishing passing volume from score control.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Passes per match | Time leading (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 515.44 | 38.8 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 495.67 | 13.7 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 483.11 | 32.1 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 473.67 | 34.4 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 467.33 | 50.6 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 442.78 | 51.9 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 442.00 | 14.2 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 441.78 | 35.4 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 441.56 | 24.9 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 416.56 | 29.5 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 409.89 | 0.0 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 401.22 | 27.4 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 394.33 | 29.4 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 393.44 | 20.7 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 362.22 | 16.9 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 353.89 | 32.6 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 335.22 | 15.9 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 287.22 | 50.1 |
Passing accuracy and possessionPassing accuracy (%) × Possession (%)
Passing accuracy and possession
Possession is the average of match percentages; pass completion uses the combined pass totals.
What the chart tells us Beşiktaş led pass completion at 87.3% with 62.3% possession. These describe ball use; the xG charts are needed to assess the chances created.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Passing accuracy (%) | Possession (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 87.3 | 62.3 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 86.4 | 60.3 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 86.2 | 53.5 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 85.4 | 53.8 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 85.0 | 52.6 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 84.7 | 50.1 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 84.4 | 53.6 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 84.3 | 55.2 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 83.9 | 50.1 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 83.3 | 51.1 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 82.5 | 42.2 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 82.2 | 47.6 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 81.8 | 48.9 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 81.0 | 43.6 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 80.0 | 48.7 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 78.9 | 42.7 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 78.9 | 43.5 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 70.1 | 40.1 |
Home and away pointsHome points per home match × Away points per away match
Home and away points
Teams close to the line average similar points totals at home and away.
What the chart tells us Çaykur Rizespor averaged 0 points at home and 2 away, the largest away-over-home difference. Each rate uses only matches played at that venue.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League averageLine where the two axes are equal
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Points per home game | Points per away game |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amed SFK | 9 | 3.00 | 1.25 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | 3.00 | 1.40 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 3.00 | 0.75 |
| Galatasaray | 9 | 2.60 | 2.25 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.25 | 1.40 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | 2.25 | 1.20 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | 2.25 | 1.00 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | 2.00 | 0.25 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | 1.50 | 1.40 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | 1.40 | 0.25 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | 1.25 | 1.40 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 0.40 | 1.50 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | 0.20 | 0.75 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
Shot advantage and chance qualityShot difference per game × xG difference per match
Shot advantage and chance quality
Have teams that outshot their opponents also created the better chances? Both axes in this xG chart cover the same verified xG matches.
What the chart tells us Galatasaray leads both plotted measures, at 12.22 on the horizontal axis and 1.28 on the vertical axis. Both values describe the same verified matches.
Select a crest or choose a team above to see its details.
League average
Overlapping crests are moved apart; the lines show their actual positions on the chart.
Values · 18 teams
| Club | Matches | Shot difference per game | xG difference per match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galatasaray | 9 | 12.22 | 1.28 |
| Beşiktaş | 9 | 8.33 | 0.90 |
| Amed SFK | 9 | 5.67 | 1.04 |
| Fenerbahçe | 9 | 2.33 | 0.84 |
| Çaykur Rizespor | 9 | 1.11 | 0.06 |
| Göztepe | 9 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Gaziantep FK | 9 | 0.00 | -0.44 |
| Trabzonspor | 9 | -0.22 | 0.40 |
| İstanbul Başakşehir | 9 | -1.22 | -0.21 |
| Eyüpspor | 9 | -1.78 | -1.20 |
| Konyaspor | 9 | -1.89 | -0.07 |
| Kasımpaşa | 9 | -2.00 | 0.01 |
| Kocaelispor | 9 | -2.44 | -0.12 |
| Çorum FK | 9 | -2.78 | -0.16 |
| Samsunspor | 9 | -3.00 | -0.50 |
| Alanyaspor | 9 | -4.22 | -0.53 |
| Erzurumspor FK | 9 | -4.56 | -0.50 |
| Gençlerbirliği | 9 | -5.89 | -1.14 |